A Welcome Hello for greenskunk

[Tom Shirley]

Welcome to Our Forum of Friends and Family greenskunk. We appreciate your joining us here and look forward to hearing what peaked your interest of the Forest Friends.

Tom S. :)

[greenskunk]

Thank you so much for the welcome. There has long been a question in my mind and this forum seemed to be the place it might be answered. In your opening page, it is mentioned that Bigfoot are people. Also, I noted Janice Bartman's drawing of Fox along with the image of Fox by Tom. It is quite clear that they are very different. My question is, has there ever been a discussion as to whether Fox and his family could have been relict humans rather than Bigfoot. The image by Tom is clearly more apelike than the drawing as described by Janice Carter and the drawing of Fox is clearly more humanlike than the creature in the P/G film. There have been reports of other creatures wearing rags or clothing remnants and they, too, could be relict humans instead of Bigfoot. This is a question I have long pondered.

[Jan]

Welcome Greenskunk,

When Janice B did the drawing of Fox I ask her to draw him as he looked in his younger days. When Tom rendered the drawing here, he did so as Fox looks now, but just the head being bald. Fox is way more human looking than the BF drawing Tom rendered here.

Yes this issue of Fox and his family being relict humans has been discussed in depth before between Dmitri, Igor, John Green, and a lot of others that were involved in this discussion. John Green still holds his view point that Fox and his family are no less or more than relict or feral humans running around in woods. However John Green has never visited me here nor has he seen Fox and his family members in the flesh.

Fox and his family members are very much relict hominids ie. Sasquatch. Fox just happens to have a very human native American Indian face with the nose of an Australian Aborigines man. On the other side of the coin we have Nicki whom is Fox's youngest daughter that has a face more in order with that of a baboon muzzle with a hawked nose of the type seen on some NA Indians. Then we have Wenebojo, aka Bo whom has a odd ridge brow that has a split in the middle right over the nose, which is that of a average white man nose, and instead of going round at the top of the ears slopes off and vanishes at the ear channel opening. He always looks to me like he is wearing a NA Indian wooden mask on his face or something of the nature. Then we have Canoenay whom is Fox's grandson by Cheeco who looks exactly like Patty except he is much larger and his head is just huge. Squeaky has always looked very much like a wall eyed Gorilla except for his nose which is very petite like some of us have, what I mean by wall eyed is his eyes are really round looking in his rounded eye sockets. All the others I have seen and all the other members of Fox's extended family have almond shaped eye sockets and their eyes do not show the whites the way Squeaky's will. All have eyes set under the brow ridges.

So you see just like we are humans, they each have their own individual looks about them. But are they relict or feral humans? Well they may be humans but they are not humans like us they are Sasquatch humans. Maybe an ancient type human and peoples.

Yours,
Jan