Jan
12-21-2007, 06:02 PM
Let me try to explain this a little as best I can to you. Mind you I am not a scientist, ie. DNA expert here. Science characteristics classify all apes, humans and bigfoot type species under one category Primate. That being said, when any new species is added to this list it first comes in as unidentified primate until they can break down the individual species (apes) DNA from several different individuals and they match with what they had from the first to whatever number they need, in the case of identifying bigfoot as a bigfoot it will take seven different samples from seven different individuals, each and every time in the database conclusively through out with no variant except for individual characteristics as would be the case between mine and your DNA samples if they were to test them and compare them to one another. In other words we both are human, but not the same individual.
Keep in mind that I just said we have to have seven individual DNA samples from seven different individuals. Now let us say more about this. These separate samples can not come from any of the one's that have already been tested family's blood group. In other words, the scientist will not take per say a sample from Fox, his daughter Nicki, his grandson Shay, and his nephew Canoenay's, DNA samples and say all right here are four of the seven differentiate individual samples needed. No they have to be from unrelated geologies,(family blood ties) that do not match this closely. They can not be related this closely in any way shape or form, however they can be related very distant cousins. So you see we have a bit of a problem on our hands. Right now with Jeff Meldrum coming in fourth with his latest sample we still need three more samples to let the scientist test. I know of exactly four that have been tested. One being that of Fox submitted by me. Two being that of another submitted by William Dranginis back some four or five years ago. Three being that of Igor Burtsev from Russia with that of Zana and her son Khwits. And, our latest being that from Jeff Meldrum from the blood he collected off those screws.
The test from all four of these have all shown to be exactly one base difference from that of human DNA. While the chimpanzee is 35 Base difference from human DNA. That tiny one base difference however falls within the chimpanzee's DNA coding. So do we call the bigfoot human or do we call them chimpanzee or do we give them a name of Homo=man of some type species or what do we call them exactly? Right now until we have the other three samples we can not call them any other thing except Unknown Primate.
Let me tell you these scientist do not make it easy on any of us. We're out breaking our necks trying to get this achieved while they are back in the labs running the test on the DNA we are all working together as best we can as fast as we can. It takes from $4000.00 and upward for each test done. It also takes the DNA experts anywhere from 180 to 365 working days to break the individual strains of DNA down to the basis they can get them to in order to make show they are not anything else here on the planet other than what they are. The first 650 bases from the cytochrome b gene which is about 2/3 of the total cytochrome b gene in all mammals. With just these 650 cytochrome b genes bigfoot match human DNA 100%. Once you start breaking the cytochrome b gene bases down from this number you start finding differences. Cytochrome b is a gene found in the cell mitochondria so therefore it is referred to as mitochondrial DNA.
There are a whole lot of other factors that play into the DNA sequences data as etectropherogram or chromatogram, types G, A, T and C and both exon and intron just to mention a few. The scientist don't do these testing for free, THEY NEED MONEY TOO, and the more you have them break the DNA down the more it will cost. I've spent out over 24 grand trying to get Fox's ran as far as they could go on it. I'm flat broke because of this. Until we can get a grant or some help, money wise, somewhere we are at a slight stand still. I wish I was a multi millionaire so I could get all this done and get the other three different individuals DNA ran also. Until we have the money needed, we are left sitting here with, so to speak, an empty bag.
I've had backers in the past also, but we all have ran out of money. We just keep going until we either get grants to help out with this or we find someone that wishes to help us. Even if we have a body we have to have seven of them not just one to prove the bigfoot exist. That is why I say it is non-profitable to even consider killing one, the chances are to great they would kill you in retaliation, and you still are not getting anywhere with just one body. NO KILL find other less harmful ways to collect samples.
Yours,
Jan
Keep in mind that I just said we have to have seven individual DNA samples from seven different individuals. Now let us say more about this. These separate samples can not come from any of the one's that have already been tested family's blood group. In other words, the scientist will not take per say a sample from Fox, his daughter Nicki, his grandson Shay, and his nephew Canoenay's, DNA samples and say all right here are four of the seven differentiate individual samples needed. No they have to be from unrelated geologies,(family blood ties) that do not match this closely. They can not be related this closely in any way shape or form, however they can be related very distant cousins. So you see we have a bit of a problem on our hands. Right now with Jeff Meldrum coming in fourth with his latest sample we still need three more samples to let the scientist test. I know of exactly four that have been tested. One being that of Fox submitted by me. Two being that of another submitted by William Dranginis back some four or five years ago. Three being that of Igor Burtsev from Russia with that of Zana and her son Khwits. And, our latest being that from Jeff Meldrum from the blood he collected off those screws.
The test from all four of these have all shown to be exactly one base difference from that of human DNA. While the chimpanzee is 35 Base difference from human DNA. That tiny one base difference however falls within the chimpanzee's DNA coding. So do we call the bigfoot human or do we call them chimpanzee or do we give them a name of Homo=man of some type species or what do we call them exactly? Right now until we have the other three samples we can not call them any other thing except Unknown Primate.
Let me tell you these scientist do not make it easy on any of us. We're out breaking our necks trying to get this achieved while they are back in the labs running the test on the DNA we are all working together as best we can as fast as we can. It takes from $4000.00 and upward for each test done. It also takes the DNA experts anywhere from 180 to 365 working days to break the individual strains of DNA down to the basis they can get them to in order to make show they are not anything else here on the planet other than what they are. The first 650 bases from the cytochrome b gene which is about 2/3 of the total cytochrome b gene in all mammals. With just these 650 cytochrome b genes bigfoot match human DNA 100%. Once you start breaking the cytochrome b gene bases down from this number you start finding differences. Cytochrome b is a gene found in the cell mitochondria so therefore it is referred to as mitochondrial DNA.
There are a whole lot of other factors that play into the DNA sequences data as etectropherogram or chromatogram, types G, A, T and C and both exon and intron just to mention a few. The scientist don't do these testing for free, THEY NEED MONEY TOO, and the more you have them break the DNA down the more it will cost. I've spent out over 24 grand trying to get Fox's ran as far as they could go on it. I'm flat broke because of this. Until we can get a grant or some help, money wise, somewhere we are at a slight stand still. I wish I was a multi millionaire so I could get all this done and get the other three different individuals DNA ran also. Until we have the money needed, we are left sitting here with, so to speak, an empty bag.
I've had backers in the past also, but we all have ran out of money. We just keep going until we either get grants to help out with this or we find someone that wishes to help us. Even if we have a body we have to have seven of them not just one to prove the bigfoot exist. That is why I say it is non-profitable to even consider killing one, the chances are to great they would kill you in retaliation, and you still are not getting anywhere with just one body. NO KILL find other less harmful ways to collect samples.
Yours,
Jan