Opinions On Jacobs Photo?

[lighthouselady92]

I just wanted to get your opinion on what this may be. Some say it's a bear with mange, others say it is a juvenile forest friend? This is of very high interest to me. This gamecam photo was taken less than a two hours drive from where I do most of my research. Please any help would be appreciated.

http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u122/lighthouselady92/jacobs_3_blowup.jpg

[Jan]

and welcome to our website.

I have viewed these clip photos several times of the past few weeks. I can say without much doubt that it is a primate of some type. Bear and other native animals do not have a stance or body structure of this type.
When viewing these two photos we see in the first that the young juvenile bigfoot approaches the tree in a semi-upright position and we can clearly see it's left arm and hand pretty clearly, even it's fingers on this hand if you zoom the image a fraction.

I've seen a lot of things in my life time but for the life of me I can not exactly figure out what this young bigfoot is trying to celebrate in the second image photo. The one you have posted here. To me it looks as if it is trying it's best to do a Somers Sault and has it's head on the ground in the middle of the flip of its heels over head. this second image is very complicated to make out and distinguish exactly which end is up and which is down. It may have realized it was being photographed and tried to make it's self as small and contorted as it could in order to get away from the area of filming.

I would suggest you keep up your research in the general area and keep a camera of high resolution handy when in the forest. I don't know if you could get to the exact location these pictures were made at, but it would be worth your while to investigate.

For the most part the bigfoot are creatures of nature just like we are. They will live out their lives in the same general area if the supply of food and vegetation is in abundance and enough to substantiate them. This young bigfoot probably stumbled into this camp while out foraging for food. They tend to use the same range patterns, animal trails and areas each day or night making their rounds looking for food. Only if the supply runs low or out will they vary from their usually territory.

We welcome any observations, suggestions or responses to this posting.
Thank you for your post Lighthouselady.
Yours,
Jan

28

[Tom Shirley]

I believe the young FF was just picking up food off the ground that was left there. The young black bear was also eating something from the same spot. If you click on the pictures they do up size for you a better view. Here is a pic of the bear cub in the same location.

Tom S

30

[Lawrence Leavell]

Well, what about the Pennsylvania experts who claim this is just a photo of a tail-less, skinny, mangy bear. Haven't we ALL seen one of those lately? :-)

[steve a]

this reminds me of the juvinile i ran in to in ind, notice the v in the arm area, only bigfoot has this, no human on earth has this, or bears, or any other animals as far as that go, the legs , back structure suggest muscles running to the neck are , like a bigfoot, and the hair size is the same size as the juvinile i seen, so to me it is a juvinile bigfoot trying to get away from a camera, any way it can, or i knows its got caught and is bending over to kiss its self good bye, lol ,who knows , steve

[Jan]

Well, what about the Pennsylvania experts who claim this is just a photo of a tail-less, skinny, mangy bear. Haven't we ALL seen one of those lately? :-)

Sure we have! Don't you remember? It was that poor hairless skinny thing that didn't have a tail that your ran over back a month ago or so. Bet you missed that one too. :} LOL

Ok, back to the old drawing board. As for my opinion those so called experts don't know what they are talking about. Bear my foot. Bear do not have hands. They sure don't walk hunched over like that, they don't curl into a ball like it is trying to do and put their heads on the ground and their heads are not human shaped. Besides all this, I might not should say this, but if you zoom in on that picture close enough you can make out the outline of a male human type organ between the legs. Bear's don't have this feature.
Yours,
Jan

[Teagle]

I reviewed the only known photos of the Jacob's series on youtube.com. However, the last photo depicted was of a "small bear!" A cub in fact. The other three photos depicted an "entity" that far exceeded the proportions of the bear in the last photo. Having been affected first-hand by psychic bigfoot ability some years ago; I am leaning more to believe (as strange as it may seem) that the bigfoot have the ability to either:

A.) make you see what is not there

OR

B.) have an uncanny ability to "shape-shift" at shear will

OR

C.) The Jacob Photos are "trickery!" (of which I do not believe!) Really, I believe that the happenchanced upon something strange that night. They are most likely trying in vein to figure out exactly WHAT happened to them.


:)

[Jan]

I reviewed the only known photos of the Jacob's series on youtube.com. However, the last photo depicted was of a "small bear!" A cub in fact. The other three photos depicted an "entity" that far exceeded the proportions of the bear in the last photo. Having been affected first-hand by psychic bigfoot ability some years ago; I am leaning more to believe (as strange as it may seem) that the bigfoot have the ability to either:

A.) make you see what is not there

OR

B.) have an uncanny ability to "shape-shift" at shear will

OR

C.) The Jacob Photos are "trickery!" (of which I do not believe!) Really, I believe that the happenchanced upon something strange that night. They are most likely trying in vein to figure out exactly WHAT happened to them.


:)

I'm not so sure on the shape shifting, but totally agree on the other two. The bigfoot do have some unique physic abilities. This coming from a woman that stood right there beside you when we both got bomb barded. Let me tell you, if you don't watch out and are not prepared for this, it can cause you physical distress in a whopping hurry that will take you hours to get over. You sort of get use to this after a time, until one comes along that mentally attacks you.
Yours,
Jan

[lighthouselady92]

This report was originially posted as a different county than it was actually in. The pics were taken in McKean County, there are numerous reports from the surrounding area. I have been there many times and there is ample room for a family of forest friends to live. There are many natural lakes and streams in the area and an abundunt source of deer and wild food, berries, apple trees and such. This photo has been deemed as a bear by many different organizations just because of Jacobs associating himself with the BFRO. Jan does that sound familiar? Back to the pic, the arm length and the hair in the picture should say it all. The length of the limbs are not in the range for a bear, and if this animal had mange like they all say, it would have big bald spots, all I see is an even coat of hair all over the body. I will be in that area this summer, armed with the trusty camera, maybe I'll get my Canon Rebel this X-mas, 6 shots per second...oh how I can wish! Happy Holidays to all!

[Jan]

This report was originially posted as a different county than it was actually in. The pics were taken in McKean County, there are numerous reports from the surrounding area. I have been there many times and there is ample room for a family of forest friends to live. There are many natural lakes and streams in the area and an abundunt source of deer and wild food, berries, apple trees and such. This photo has been deemed as a bear by many different organizations just because of Jacobs associating himself with the BFRO. Jan does that sound familiar? Back to the pic, the arm length and the hair in the picture should say it all. The length of the limbs are not in the range for a bear, and if this animal had mange like they all say, it would have big bald spots, all I see is an even coat of hair all over the body. I will be in that area this summer, armed with the trusty camera, maybe I'll get my Canon Rebel this X-mas, 6 shots per second...oh how I can wish! Happy Holidays to all!

Well the organizations will say what they wish about each other and members therein. Franky I could care less. If someone, and I don't care who it is from whatever organization gets good pictures, or even half way decent pictures of a bigfoot they should be praised for doing so. I was never a member of the BFRO but I have dealt with some very good researchers from that group. The same can be said for other groups. You have your good and your bad all over. It would be nice if we could all come together and get along. That will never happen, because just like in any other work force you have people that just simply do not agree.
I wish you great success out there. I don't see why you should not find evidence of their being there. Maybe you will get some great pictures also. All right I going to dive in here and give a little trick tip to you that has worked for us. If you will take and hide the camera inside a plastic black garbage bag with only the lenses showing and the snap button so you can snap the picture easy and hold it not above your chest they don't notice the camera as much. Your more likely to be able to get close to them and they not detect the camera or your intent to use it so much.
Yours,
Jan

[Lawrence Leavell]

I viewed the analysis of the Jacob photos, detailing how the legs are more than 100% the body length, while a bear's limbs would be more in the range of 40% of the body length.
This, of course, must force the Pennsylvania wildlife folks to conclude that this is none other than a tail-less, skinny, mangy bear on stilts.

[Tom Shirley]

Next it will be wrote off as an escaped chimpanzee.

[Galileo]

I believe the young FF was just picking up food off the ground that was left there. The young black bear was also eating something from the same spot. If you click on the pictures they do up size for you a better view. Here is a pic of the bear cub in the same location.

Tom S

30


Tom, I agree. You can clearly see a pile of darker stuff in 2 of the photos. I think the photographer piled up some bait to tempt the subjects into the shot.

[Tom Shirley]

Tom, I agree. You can clearly see a pile of darker stuff in 2 of the photos. I think the photographer piled up some bait to tempt the subjects into the shot.

If you look at the bottom of the second picture, it does seem to be a salt or mineral block. A trail cam attached to a tree was also used. If there would have been an adult FF there, a big hand would have covered the trail cam so that no picture would have been taken. The youngster just slipped up a bit and was caught, he must have been very hungry to have not taken off after the first flash. All the better though that are trying to prove that they do exist. :rolleyes:

[Galileo]

If you look closely at the photos there are no harsh shadows from a flash. This leads me to believe this camera may be an IR unit.

[Galileo]

I just popped over to the BFRO web-site. My assumption is correct. The camera is IR.

http://www.bfro.net/avevid/jacobs/jacobs_photos.asp

It says:

Camera: Bushnell trail camera (automatic) with infrared (invisible) flash. Camera placed by R. Jacobs.

[Tom Shirley]

I guess that would not scare him away unless he saw the infrared flash.

[Galileo]

I don't think they actually have a pulse of energy. I think they put out more of a continuous glow. But I could be wrong.

I used to be a professional photographer. I in the 1980's I attended Ohio Institute of Photography. But, It has been a long time, and I did not actually use a IR flash unit back then.

However, I did look into IR for a friend this summer.

[Galileo]

Hey Jan,

Do you happen to know what the visual range of a bigfoot is in the electromagnetic spectrum? Humans see approximately from 400 nm to 700 nm. IR is longer than 700 nm. It would be interesting to know if the bigfoot can actually see in the IR range.:o

[lighthouselady92]

Tom, there was a mineral/salt lick in the bottom corner of the picture. I also tend to believe that Mr. Jacobs was baiting the area, not for our forest friends but to up the ante during deer or bear season. This is illegal to do in Pa. I'm suprised the Game commission didn't fine him for this, the pics were taken approximately 2 and a half months before the opening of deer season.

[Jan]

Hey Jan,

Do you happen to know what the visual range of a bigfoot is in the electromagnetic spectrum? Humans see approximately from 400 nm to 700 nm. IR is longer than 700 nm. It would be interesting to know if the bigfoot can actually see in the IR range.:o

I know that when tested they seen 900nm and I'm thinking the last time it was more than that. They hate bright lights being turned on in their faces at night. We got so we used the small incandescent lights as they don't bother their eyes so much, but I always warn them when I am fixing to turn on an outside light if they are near the house of the night time.
Yours,
Jan

[Jan]

Tom, there was a mineral/salt lick in the bottom corner of the picture. I also tend to believe that Mr. Jacobs was baiting the area, not for our forest friends but to up the ante during deer or bear season. This is illegal to do in Pa. I'm suprised the Game commission didn't fine him for this, the pics were taken approximately 2 and a half months before the opening of deer season.

I know that the bigfoot like and need salt just the same as we do. If you are going to leave out any salt for them use the pure white salt block or regular table salt. The mineral block salt used for cattle is not that good for them. That is not saying they will not eat it or the deer salt licks but these are not as good for their digestive systems as the white salt. Oh and if you give them any meat to eat they like Garlic salt flavoring. I know that if I boiled chicken for them and placed in butter and garlic salt they would make short order of the chicken. Gizzards and chicken liver is easy to come by and doesn't cost all that much. If you place it boiled in some cheep dry dog food and mix up a bucket they will eat this. Know this is going to sound nuts here, but Old Roy chunk dry dog food is not so bad tasting and can be consumed by humans safely. I have a tendency to ask about the oddest things and test taste it if a doctor tells me it will not hurt a human to eat it.
Yours,
Jan

[Tom Shirley]

Know this is going to sound nuts here, but Old Roy chunk dry dog food is not so bad tasting and can be consumed by humans safely. I have a tendency to ask about the oddest things and text taste it if a doctor tells me it will not hurt a human to eat it.
Yours,
Jan

Lets Please not forget the past happenings.

Please be careful if any dog food that you may have, does not have those serial #s that were recalled not long ago. Please buy the newer bags that are suppose to be safe for our own pets now. :rolleyes:

[AllSmiles]

I'd have to say that is without a doubt a young FF. He is just getting down to get a good whiff of the deer scent Jacobs put out. I have one of the same cameras. It doesn't flash but there is a slight red light. I am really surprised he got two pictures. The quickest you can take a picture after the last is 30 seconds--if I am not mistaken. The little guy was really checking things out. He's a handsome young lad.

[ravellette]

In the picture with the bears, you can clearly see the salt lick. If you look at the one with the juvi, why is there a black cover half way on the salt? These pictures were taken half hour from each other correct?
________
vaporizer pipe (http://vaporizers.net/vapor-genie)

[Tom Shirley]

I believe the gift for the bears was in a black feed pan.